Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) is seeking feedback on Proposal P1055, which aims to redefine how genetically modified (GM) foods are classified. We urge the organic sector to unite in requesting an extension to the submission deadline and advocating for an open forum with civil society organisations and the broader community. This will allow for a transparent discussion of the full implications of the draft proposal, which has not been given adequate time for thorough public scrutiny.
We are concerned that FSANZ is not considering the broader implications that may undermine the due process required for such a significant regulatory change. You can make your own HERE (by 5pm September 10th, 2024)
Proposal P1055 is FSANZ’s effort to update and clarify the definitions of GM foods within the Food Standards Code. FSANZ argues that the current definitions, which distinguish between “food produced using gene technology” and “gene technology,” are outdated and do not adequately cover the variety of modern techniques, including New Breeding Techniques (NBTs). To address this, FSANZ proposes a single, streamlined definition of “genetically modified food” and suggests exempting certain NBT foods and refined ingredients from pre-market assessment. The organic sector is concerned that exempting NBT foods could mean that some GMO foods would no longer need to be labelled. This could mislead consumers relying on clear labelling to make informed decisions about their eating choices.
New Breeding Techniques (NBTs) are advanced genetic methods that alter the DNA of plants and animals. Although NBTs are sometimes marketed as different from traditional GMOs, they still involve genetic modification. The organic sector insists that food products produced using NBTs must be clearly labelled because they involve artificial genetic changes that consumers have the right to know about. Clear labelling ensures transparency and allows consumers to make informed choices aligned with their values, especially in maintaining the integrity of organic and natural food standards.
The organic sector is deeply concerned about the rapid pace of the P1055 proposal and the potential consequences it poses for the organic sector in Australia and New Zealand. The proposal’s shift from a “process-based” to an “outcome-based” definition of GM foods that could lead to reduced transparency, making it harder for consumers to determine whether their food has been produced using gene technology. FSANZ’s decision to exclude NBT foods and refined ingredients from pre-market assessment, claiming they pose no greater risk than conventional foods, is particularly troubling. This approach risks undermining consumer trust and the integrity of organic labelling, which depends on full traceability and clear labelling of all GM ingredients. Despite public demand for labelling GM and gene-edited foods, FSANZ has stated that GM labelling is “out of scope” for this proposal, though some changes to labelling provisions are proposed.
The FSANZ Proposal P1055 poses a significant threat to the transparency and integrity of our organic standards. To ensure thorough public consultation, we must act now. We urgently need you to complete this survey and/or register a submission with FSANZ before September 10th.
The organic sector depends on strong, clear regulations to maintain the integrity of our products and the trust of our consumers. Your participation is crucial in ensuring that these standards are not compromised.
Excellent resources are HERE (thanks to OANZ) for those that are seeking more information.
Thank you for your continued support and commitment to protecting our organic community.
If you are interested in supporting or helping with this campaign – drop us an email hello@organicinvestmentcooperative.com.au
Consider joining ORICoop HERE. Or Organic Industries Australia HERE (our organic industry body)
Please share the Consumer Survey HERE with as many consumers, customers and concerned eaters that you know!
Second Call for Submissions: Close on 10 September 2024, closes 6pm AST, 8pm NZT
FSANZ is proposing to exempt certain foods made through gene technologies like gene editing food. These foods derived from New Breeding Techniques (NBTs) / gene edited, genetically engineered or vat fermented foods will escape regulation and labelling as they will be considered the same as conventional foods (novel). The exempted GE foods will be released into the food chain untested, unlabelled and potentially unhealthy for the dietary needs of consumers. This could damage health and lead to illnesses that are misdiagnosed due to the lack of oversight and diagnostic methods for Health Professionals.
Please look at suggestions in the template below and re-write your submission in your own words.
FSANZ has a Consultation Hub where you can directly submit your comments or email submissions@foodstandards.gov.au or postal address ,which can be found on their site.
Re: Second Call for submission: P1055 Definitions for gene technology and new breeding techniques Email to: submissions@foodstandards.gov.au I object to the FSANZ proposal P1055 to exempt gene edited and GM food processes and ingredients from notification, assessment, regulation, and labelling. I therefore strongly insist on –
|
Other World References –
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(23)00255-3/fulltext
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6672233/
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-68215777
ORICoop hosted an impromptu online presentation regarding the current Avian Flu outbreak that was attended by Pastured Poultry producers around Australia. Thanks particularly to Karen Gurney from Redsun Nutrition, Paolo Crofts from Tall Poppy Farm and Venu from Melbourne Eggs. And thanks to the event sponsors NASAA and Organic Industries of Australia
Karen Gurney – Biosecurity Best Practice
FEED SECURITY
Ensuring sufficient quantities of ingredients are available to meet your feed requirements on an ongoing basis.
Grains and proteins make up the bulk of the feed composition and as farming crops they are dependent on climatic conditions. Both floods and droughts affect the quality, the energy and protein content of the grain or seed. The poultry industry has a large demand for soybean meal, and the local production volume does not meet this requirement, so it is imported. With the spotlight on sustainability, we are looking at replacements for soybean meal, especially locally grown crops. There is a lot of nutrition research covering what ingredients and how much can be fed to broilers and layers to maintain performance.
Micro ingredients usually come from overseas. Supply can be affected by shipping, freight and production issues in different countries. Interruption to the supply chain was severe during the covid years and still is not back to being reliable. We have been advised the coming Q3 and Q4 months will have supply delays due to shipping.
The requirement for organic grains and protein sources is even more difficult as the production volumes are much less than non-organic. We are always looking to the next harvest, looking for new farmers to grow organic crops, keeping track of new research, new crop rotational practices to improve soil and yields.
A few years ago, the local crop volumes were low, we had to source from overseas and this required strict exemption from the certifying bodies to allow us to do that. We needed to do this to keep feeding the birds, with welfare being our priority.
FEED NUTRITION 
There are a few parts to this. First is the nutrients required by the bird, as a growing pullet and as an egg producing hen. During these stages and throughout life, the nutrient requirements of poultry change. They depend on genetics and breed, age, sex (males for broilers or breeder sires), body weight, reproductive state, ambient temperature, housing system, range activity, health status, and production aims of egg numbers or egg size.
The 2nd part to nutrition is the nutrient intake. This is affected by the nutrient composition of the feed and the amount eaten. Ingredient quality, feed form as a pellet or mash, contamination can affect the amount of feed eaten. For egg layers, the aim is to maximise egg production at minimum feed cost, while controlling egg size and egg quality.
It is important to always know your feed intake so that either the feed intake or the ration specifications can be adjusted to meet the hen’s requirements. For example, a young pullet coming into lay will be eating 70 – 80 grams/day, at 25 weeks she will be eating around 115g/day and then as she ages and produces eggs that will be 125g to 145g/day. Usually, we will feed at least 3 different feeds; early, mid and late layer rations all with very different nutrient specifications. When only one ration is fed for the whole of production, it gets a bit trickier and the hens are often fed ad lib to allow them to regulate their intake.
The 3rd part is the nutrients. Carbohydrates are the main source of energy, provided by cereal grains. Fats and oils provide energy and essential fatty acids. Proteins and the amino acids that make up protein and are used mainly for tissue growth, feather growth, egg production. Vitamins and minerals are required for normal health, growth and production, they are required for many physiological processes in the body.
FEED BIOSECURITY
This covers the feeding of safe feed. Some questions to consider how they relate to your farm;
There was a time when I didn’t know a lot about biosecurity, I looked after nutrition, and I considered biosecurity to be veterinary. I have clients in Qld, NSW, Vic and PNG. I quarantine before and after visiting poultry farms, I sign the visitors log. I use the foot baths, I wash the wheels of my car, I wear PPE or shower on and off farms. I am now so much more diligent. It is our responsibility to keep the industry resilient and going forward.
What can you do? Build biosecurity into your everyday best work practice. Develop and on-farm biosecurity plan, use the National Farm Biosecurity Manual for Poultry Production as your guide. Ask for help; understanding how you can better safeguard your business can be the difference between being anxious about the worst case scenario and feeling empowered to keep prospering as individuals, as a business and as an industry.
FAQS – Questions asked by Attendees with answers from presenters.
QUESTION – Can water treatment help? ie with Hydrogen peroxide , Acetic Acid , EM effective microbes, this is assuming that waters are blocked off from access other than watering posts.
Re transport declarations – if it is organic then documentation should accompany each incoming load of stockfeed, if you have capacity built into your supply agreement a clause that covers biosecurity issues.
QUESTION – We need to approach the government for subsidies to purchase effective equipment like the green lasers. We also need industry wide insurance to sustain businesses affected by closures. We spoke to Ag Vic today and they said it’s just a matter of time before the H5N1 appears in Australia. Do we have an industry body that can speak for us as a whole?
RESPONSE – currently there is not a Pastured Poultry representative group. However these are resources we would suggest growers get engaged with:-
QUESTION –Do chickens recover from Avian Influenza?
RESPONSE – Infected birds die from the severe symptoms with high mortality; it can be 100% mortality.
QUESTION – If the ducks are spreading it, are the ducks dying?
RESPONSE – Wild birds are carriers without showing symptoms of the disease.
QUESTION – How have these “outbreak farms” identified that they have Avian Influenza?
RESPONSE – The first signs would have been increased unexplained deaths or the onset of severe symptoms. This would have required veterinary assessment which if not explained would have escalated to calling the Emergency Animal Disease Hotline.
QUESTION – Why are the wild birds apparently not showing the signs of these viruses in a way that our poultry is showing up?
RESPONSE – Wild birds and ducks are the natural host of AI and they do not show symptoms of the disease. They shed the virus in saliva, nasal secretions and in faeces. Domestic poultry are very susceptible to the virus and develop symptoms and disease.
QUESTION – What is the risk with fermented food / sprouts and salmonella contamination
RESPONSE – Poultry feed is at high risk for salmonella contamination. Commercial feed is better when pelleted as the high temperatures used in the pelleting process kills the salmonella. Mash feeds and on farm mixing of ingredients requires good hygiene, good rodent control and clean ingredients. This will reduce the risk of contamination.
COMMENTS:- I sat on the Australian Eggs webinar yesterday and quickly discovered that farmers are not well equipped to stop the contamination from wild birds. And the pastured poultry people are almost blamed for this.
RESPONSE – Industry must be proactive – and have a high level of biosecurity and risk mitigation practices in place. Including records and paper trails.
COMMENTS:- Thank you Paola, great presentation. Are you only feeding fermented grain, or what else makes up your total ration? One further question, what is your brooder set up to raise your own chicks
Paola: We feed 36% of fermented organic grains and the rest is an organic pellet that they can eat as they choose. I have two brooders, one has heat and the other does not have heat until they go out on the pasture at 12 weeks. The brooder with heat is fully insulated and easy to clean with concrete floor so no rat issues. The outside brooder has an outside area with a high fence. Happy to discuss further.
Fermented food for 400 birds is 8 parts wheat to 1/2 part wheat (approx 20 kg in total) per day. This ration suggested was 8 parts wheat to 1/2 part peas, then double water, cover the wheat with twice as much water
Nicole: There is a professor who contacted me about antivirals for poultry against AI but it is only early days. If anyone is interested in this, happy to pass on his details.
Paola: A question regarding pursuing herd immunity rather than mass culling?
RESPONSE – Herd immunity is not recognised at this stage due to high fatality in existing cases.
Speakers contacts for further enquiry:-
Karen Gurney – Redsun Nutrition, Poultry Nutrition specialist
Email – redsunnutrition@optusnet.com.au
Paola Crofts – Tall Poppy Farm
Email –tallpoppyfarm@gmail.com
Venu – Melbourne Eggs
Email – vmetla@tekbytes.com.au
Jean Belstead – Natural homeopathic remedies for poultry (mentioned during latter part of presentation)
AVIAN FLU NATURAL PREVENTION & TREATMENT
Homeopathic component:
Herbal component:
Contact Jean directly to order remedies via email – jeanbelstead@gmail.com
Other Important Resources:-
Secure poultry feeders that minimises access by wild birds:-
Thanks again to our Sponsors – NASAA and Organic Industries of Australia
And our Speakers – Tall Poppy Farm Melbourne Eggs Redsun Nutrition
Thanks to those that attended the online event and asked lots of questions. We hope this blog is a helpful resource for producers that are managing and mitigating the risks of Avian Influenza. Feel free to contact the speakers directly via email or to follow ORICoop to connect with other pastured and/or organic producers for other beneficial resources.
Link to the live recording of the online Pastured Poultry event below or link HERE. We welcome you to listen, share and learn! And be proactive in mitigating the risk of Avian Flu and a health pastured poultry growing system on your farm!
ORICoop and the presenters have collated this information to the best of their ability. It is provided in good faith and should be used as suggestions only for mitigating risk to a poultry enterprise. At no time does ORICoop or presenters guarantee these suggestions will prevent infection or transmission in what is an unknown or quantified risk. We recommend you seek expert veterinary advice for any sick birds and consult with your Agricultural department or certifier with regard to any treatment protocols.
The Organic Development Group (ODG) consists of eleven organisations including certification, consumer, investment, and advocacy associations, who have over the past seven months joined together for the specific purpose of achieving regulatory reform in the Australian domestic market. The ODG has met three times in person, once virtually and has convened two separate working groups to facilitate foundational work streams such as research and review of potential pathways towards the shared goal of domestic regulation. The ODG is a voluntary group with representation by 11 industry groups. The Secretariat is resourced by Australian Organic Llimited, NASAA Organic and Organic Industries Australia (OIA) and funded by Australian Organic limited and NASAA Organic.
The group’s success was witnessed by the Australian Government at the inaugural Parliamentary Friends of Organic in Canberra during Organic Awareness Month. The Parliamentary Friends group was founded by Dan Repacholi, Member for Hunter, and Aaron Violi, Member for Casey. During the event Minister for Agriculture Senator Murray Watt attended and spoke of the importance of our industry and bipartisan support was demonstrated by the inclusion of Shadow Minister for Agriculture and Leader of the National Party David Littleproud in the final formalities.
ODG representatives are standing shoulder to shoulder, calling for reform and working as a united front. It is a credit to the representatives and the Secretariat how much has been achieved in such a short period of time. Well done to the ODG representatives for putting the industry’s future first and making this critical progress.
Photo: Greg Paynter
Members of Parliament from across the political spectrum have joined international dignitaries and an array of the country’s top certified organic producers for a historic event at Parliament House to mark the formation of the Parliamentary Friends of Australia’s Organic Industry (PFAOI)
Recognising the certified organic industry’s development into a major export earner and economic driver that contributes $851m directly into the domestic economy, the barbecue lunch featured a range of certified organic produce and hosted the newly formed Organic Development Group (ODG).
The ODG brings together all of Australia’s certification bodies and key industry groups into one forum and presents a united voice on issues such as the need for domestic regulation of the word “organic” for clarity to consumers.
Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Murray Watt, addressed the event and acknowledged the organic industry’s position as a major contributor to Australia’s image abroad as a producer of clean, green and high-quality produce and products.
“This industry is a core part of our agriculture sector,” Minister Watt said.
“As a government we’ve been particularly keen to focus on how we can be supporting the organics sector with its export efforts.”
“I know there was a very productive meeting held earlier today between representatives of the organics industry with the relevant departments to talk through some of the new and emerging export opportunities that we’ve been able to negotiate for our good organic products as well.”
PFAOI Co-chair, Aaron Violi MP, said establishing the group was an important step in elevating the industry.
“I used to work in the industry selling organic food and I’ve seen firsthand how the industry has grown over the last few decades and it’s an amazing industry that has big potential,” Mr Violi said.
“It’s already delivering a lot and there are things we need to do in this house to make sure that we can allow it to continue to grow.”
Australian Organic Limited (AOL) hosted the function which was attended by more than 200 people including Minister for Trade and Tourism Don Farrell, Leader of the Nationals David Littleproud, MPs, Senators, the Swedish Ambassador, and representatives from the New Zealand High Commission, and the United States and French embassies.
AOL Chief Executive Officer, Niki Ford said it was timely recognition for producers.
“Today is an important day for us as an industry,” Ms Ford said.
“September is traditionally Australian Organic Awareness Month, so it is great for us to be talking about the real reason you should be choosing certified organic products.”
“Organic is regenerative, organic is sustainable and organic production systems positively contribute to climate resilience and biodiversity.”
“Every organic operator who is certified has to go through a rigorous audit to substantiate their claims which underpins the importance of looking for certification marks.”
“But without domestic regulation you can have as little as one ingredient and still claim organic on your packaging in Australia. Research has shown about one-third of consumers have reported being misled by deceptive packaging so truth in labelling is an important issue for our industry.”
ORICoop Director Greg Paynter reflected on the event
“Whilst aware of the political issues of being around 3% of the agriculture production in Australia, it was pleasing to see the government and its agencies willing to listen to the concerns we face, but also to understand the benefit we can proactively assist with in the wider agriculture sector, in addressing externalities, traceability, profitability and biodiversity conservation (noting the dedicated biodiversity set aside system of the organic standard requirements to 10% of the land area of Australia’s Nation Park estate). ORICoop directors were able to talk to attendees from Government members and Department’s and fellow industry members in various forums regarding supply chain constraints and market opportunities both in domestic and export environments. Good contacts were made that are likely to benefit across the organic industry.”
ORICoop Director, Sandra Fishwick added her inspiration
“It’s important to recognise the value of Organic, green, clean soil and high quality foods while nurturing your health and building a future beyond the present”.
ORICoop Director, Carolyn Suggate outlined the following after the day.
“‘The future of our farming and environmental systems depends on the world transitioning to a better version of agriculture. The organic sector can provide much of this knowledge and demonstrates the increasing appetite from consumers for more integrity, provenance and trust in the food they desire. ORICoop is at the forefront of growing these markets and increasing the opportunity for organic growers across Australia. We are excited at the support shown by the Government and their interest to further the pathway for domestic regulation and integrity in the Nationally accredited organic standard. Not a moment too soon!”
The 11-member ODG, which includes all of Australia’s certification bodies and major industry groups provides a united voice to pursue domestic regulation of the word ‘organic’.
Organic Producer and Organic Industries Australia Director, Ian James, said it’s essential for the thousands of businesses that have gone through the process of certification.
“The whole industry is built around verification and certification of the organic claim, and this must be enforceable,” Mr James said.
“We have come together to create the ODG with the realisation that the only way forward for the organic industry to achieve domestic regulation is with the unity of one voice. Our future growth and prosperity are what is at stake.”
National Association for Sustainable Agriculture Australia General Manager, Alex Mitchell said it showed a maturing of the organic sector.
“This is an unprecedented commitment of the whole of industry in participating in not only the approach to policy development, but also in advocacy, such as the show of force at the event today,” Ms Mitchell said.
“It’s also critical to acknowledge the importance of bringing all the industry bodies together to listen to government so everyone can develop a common language for industry advancement.”
The ODG includes:
ORICoop has been in deep conversations with our members, producers, supply chain businesses and investors that are interested in a more sustainable and resilient food and farming system. We are keen to share our learnings – and to ask the question of the future of our food and financial systems. And what is the true colour of money?
Right now – Farmers around the country are innovating and transitioning quickly. Quicker in fact than Governments and Industry bodies realise. They are pressured by commodity prices, by wars overseas, by severe climatic events and rising interest rates. Yet with the current rising inflation – producers are not being paid much more than they were 5 years ago. Despite their costs increasing just like everyone else’s. Perhaps this is our new normal as outlined by The Guardian recently.
The elephant in the room is the consumer. The end buyer. The supermarkets. What people are willing to pay for healthy, local nutritious food. And has this split changed over the past 50 years – with regard to our lifestyles, work-life balance, debt and the priority of food over housing or other lifestyle choices. The deeper realisation of the value of health and how nutrient dense food affects the cost of maintaining good health.
What does this mean for farmers? This means that many producers (dairy and grain growers are good examples) are being asked to grow more volume per hectare of land than ever before. To the detriment of the nutrient density of the food and the land that it’s grown on. With the ambition to increase our agricultural production to over $100B from the National Farmers Federation. On land that is more expensive than ever in history with input and labour costs also at an all time high. And yet – the end price producers are receiving at the farm-gate is not that different to 10 years ago. In no way increasing comparative to the increased costs of food provided to consumers at the supermarket. Or linked to the highly profitable returns of the major supermarkets. The system is broken.
“The farmer is the only man in our economy who buys everything at retail, sells everything at wholesale, and pays the freight both ways.” John F Kennedy
So, how do we change this paradigm? Global Domestic Product measures the increase of our economy, yet does it attribute the true cost of this economic measure. Or considering the profitability and productivity opportunity across Agriculture – if we measured this ‘true cost’ paradigm differently. With increased labour costs, some of the highest in the world. How can Australia sustainably grow food comparative to many other countries. Yes with some of the largest swathes of land in the world. Noting New Zealand has a subsidised Pacific Island labour program. Europe has a heavily subsidised agriculture sector. And the US has strong support for commodity based agricultural production systems. Is Australia being left behind? Should we have an incentivised land stewardship package? Or is there a risk we will be priced out of the market? Or have we not demonstrated our clean and green image well enough to the rest of the world? Should we be more focussed on feeding our population before selling into these larger world commodity markets that may actually be part of the overall problem.
ORICoop with our ORCA ‘Farmers Own’ brand is on a bold mission. To provide bulk organic products that streamlines a more efficient organic supply chain. That provides healthier food economically to more people. And ensures that producers are sustainably growing what the market is demanding. Keeping the supply chain efficient, nimble and ensuring that the grower and end buyer understand the different parameters of a complex supply chain.
We are determined to build a stronger domestic organic market. So food travels less distance to more people, is more affordable and has a stronger provenance story. It can be healthier, grown and transported with less of a carbon footprint and more of a conscious understanding of how it was grown. Organic products have market fluctuations based on seasons, based on the capacity to plant or harvest crops. It takes innovative producers to manage significantly different years – from 2019 (severe drought) to the last two years of abundant rainfall and flooding in some regions. What producers need is markets that work with their capacity to grow and innovate. And to ensure that products grown have the best opportunity into the market – not just the perfect looking apples, or premium 14% protein grains or only Autumn flush dairy milk. We must get better at growing, manufacturing and utilising food in a truly sustainable way that ensures we are efficient, less wasteful and understand the planetary boundaries of truly sustainable agriculture.
What does this have to do with the Colour of Money? For many years investors have invested into Agriculture as a straight property investment. Not to underwrite our food security or support transition to better land stewardship practices. What if we used ‘true cost accounting’ to reflect the invisible cost to consumers of ameliorating the cost of the externalities of the industrial food production system? To reconsider the lucrative returns of 12-14% year on year. With the plan to exit after 7-9 years with a real estate property acquisition that includes significant capital growth. They call it ‘ethical impact’. The reality is, most agricultural investments provide a low (3-5%) cash return on investment (ROI) annually with a higher proportion allocated to capital growth – in the range of 5 – 8% annually. But is this model truly sustainable? For our population? Or for the planet?
To underwrite our food security we need to measure capital differently. One that views food security and land stewardship as critical to our very survival. Economically but also metaphorically. Did you know that producers pay a higher rate of interest on farmland (property) than standard interest rates? Even though land is property with property security? The front porch is not very palatable when you’re wanting something to eat, it is a question of priority? Why are producers left to fend for themselves when markets fluctuate and do not always reflect the true cost of food production. If true cost accounting was used in real terms farmers would be considered to be slaves, when considering their net profit (outside of a real estate gain), comparative to other lucrative and increasing wage levels across essential industries. Walden Mutual in the US is a leading example of how investment can be done differently. We need models like this in Australia, urgently.
To change this paradigm, investors must passionately support a fairer food and farm transition with a deeper lense, beyond just a philosophical idea. Investors that are patient and driven by ethical, sustainable and reasonable returns that considers farmers, and the health of the land and the food we eat. Investors that are looking for a co-beneficial relationship that revolutionises food and farm systems in a sustainable and earth centric manner. To invest into food systems that are innovative, multi-layered, diverse and resilient for food, farming and community benefit. Food systems that have short supply chains and are not commoditised for the benefit of the large agri-business sector – but are driven by the needs of our communities. First and foremost.
The ORCA investment Phase 2 is opening for investment shortly. This is an exciting step for ORICoop. It provides opportunity for larger investors to participate in supporting infrastructure investment into localised organic supply chains – infrastructure that enables grain to be processed within shorter distances. Including grain that is grown in a more regenerative and sustainable manner – that includes cover crops, legumes and specialty grains (lupins a prime example). Rather than a commoditised wheat, oat and barley focus that depletes the carbon and nutrient bank in the soil if not managed well, and is significantly affected by world markets. This limits the growth of the organic sector that has much capacity to flourish and expand into these premium niche markets. Australia has more than 55M hectares of farmland that is certified organic farmland. That is more than half the world’s total certified land area. From that land our organic sector is worth more than $3.6B (according to the Australian Organic Market Report), noting the US market has just exceeded US$60 Billion for the first time in history (from less land area). The Australian market is growing at 12-14% annually. What if this increased to $5B annually, or by 20% year on year these dividends were reinvested to improve on-farm knowledge, supply chain knowledge and efficiency with strategic market development? Whilst addressing climate change mitigation, adaption and addressing biodiversity loss as additional dividends. Australia can be a leader in supplying Asian markets and the Middle East for quality organic food and fibre. While looking after our land and our regional communities.
What the food and agriculture sectors need is a new Colour of Capital. One that is driven by urgency, yet patient and compassionate to the seasonality of agriculture and food systems in a changing climate. That understands we are all in this together. Australia must get better at growing and processing local food at scale. Like our forefathers and mothers did. To rebuild and scale efficient and local processing capacity, and to re-energise food production that enhances regions for their climatic and farming strength. And to build and value community driven food systems for the better. To have an innovative investment capacity that exemplifies our strength of markets, our capacity to grow large volumes of product in a sustainable manner, our seasonal diversity and access to land.
The world needs a different Colour of Capital that builds long term impact for the better. If you are interested in finding out more you can complete the EOI here.
Written by Carolyn Suggate,
Executive Director of ORICoop
E – Carolyn’s email
** Photo Credit – David McFall